contract vs. direct hire - which is better?

Contract Vs. Direct Hire – Which Is Best?

When people hear the word, “contract” their first reaction tends to be a negative one. Contract work is historically associated with little upside to the employee, but in 2023 does that stereotype still prove true?

Let’s start at the beginning.

According to Webster’s Dictionary, the definition of a contract is, “a binding agreement between two or more persons or parties”. Now obviously, that definition is familiar to a lot of people, but it doesn’t really give you any information about contract work.  

The bottom line is that contract work typically has a start and end date. In some cases, a contract employee may only be contracted to work for a specific period of time or on a specific project. In other cases, contractors may not have an end date, but they know that they will remain a contractor and not be eligible for direct hire.

So what are the big differences between contract vs direct hire?

Let’s look at the pros and cons of both roles.

Contract roles and direct hire roles both have advantages and disadvantages. Here are some of the pros and cons of each: 

Contract roles: 

Pros: 

  1. Flexibility. Contract roles can provide greater flexibility in terms of work schedule and project duration, allowing you to work on short-term or project-based assignments. 
  1. Higher pay. Contract roles often offer higher hourly rates or salaries to compensate for the lack of benefits and job security. 
  1. Exposure to different industries and companies. Contract roles can give you exposure to different industries and companies. This can broaden your skill set and increase your network. 

Cons: 

  1. Lack of benefits. Contract roles typically don’t offer the same benefits as direct hire roles, such as health insurance, retirement plans, and paid time off. 
  1. Limited job security. Contract roles are often short-term, which means that there is a higher risk of job loss if the project ends or if your contract is not renewed. 
  1. Limited upward mobility. Contract roles are often limited to a specific project or assignment, so there may be limited opportunities for career advancement within the company. 

Direct hire roles: 

Pros: 

  1. Stability and security. Direct hire roles offer greater job security and stability, as you are a permanent employee with the company. 
  1. Benefits. Direct hire roles typically come with benefits such as health insurance, retirement plans, and paid time off. 
  1. Career advancement. Direct hire roles offer greater opportunities for career advancement within the company. 

Cons: 

  1. Less flexibility. Direct hire roles often require a more structured work schedule. It is for this reason that they may not offer the same flexibility in terms of project duration. 
  1. Lower pay. Direct hire roles may offer lower salaries than contract roles to compensate for the benefits and job security. 
  1. Limited exposure to different industries and companies. Direct hire roles are often within a specific industry or company, which can limit your exposure to different industries and companies. 

Overall, the decision between a contract role vs. a direct hire role will depend on your individual priorities and career goals. 

Peter Cysewski, one of StaffBright’s Talent Partners focuses heavily on contract placements, specifically in the information technology sector. “Contract to hire is increasingly more popular in the tech space because technology advances so rapidly and is ever-changing, it’s important to have the right group of people on your team to get the job done. Contract to hire allows for that.”  

Looking for roles? Check out our open jobs.